Drone-mapping for public safety – webinar recording

[00:01] Introduction

[07:13] Mark Johnson – Visual Law: Photogrammetry and Forensic Visualization for the Courtroom

[07:34] Case study: Snorkeling fatality Molokini crater, Maui, Hawaii

[13:46] Case study: Navy helicopter crash in Nevada desert

[17:18] Case study: Police shooting

[20:08] Case study: Freeway collision

[23:06] Drone photogrammetry for vehicle crash to support accident reconstruction

[24:36] Photogrammetry used to counter opposition expert opinion as to vehicle position

[26:05] Photogrammetry used to establish true velocity and position from dash-cam video

[28:30] Walter Chomentowski – MSP: The pilot’s perspective of UAS operation and the image processing

[28:42] Presentation outline

[29:47] Michigan State Police: Initial Steps Toward a Successful UAS Program

[31:35] UAS Deployment Policy for Emergency Management and Law Enforcement

[32:38] MSP UAS Policy Highlights

[34:30] MSP UAS Mission Highlights

[36:07] Walter Chomentowski lost connection

[36:20] Q&A with Mark Johnson

[42:54] Walter Chomentowski rejoined the webinar

[43:32] UAS Capabilities: Car crash documentation

[45:57] UAS Capabilities: Crime scene documentation

[47:44] UAS Capabilities: Downlink Truck

[48:20] Lessons Learned

[49:26] Image Collection and Post Flight Image Processing Workflow

[55:00] Q&A

[1:14:56] Conclusion